Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 229637

Summary: Epoch for thunderbird in FC6
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andrew C Aitchison <aca21>
Component: thunderbirdAssignee: Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6CC: mcepl, mcepl, stransky
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-04 20:35:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Andrew C Aitchison 2007-02-22 12:48:29 UTC
Description of problem:

The thunderbird package in FC6 has epoch 0, but the package in updates has
no Epoch at all.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


Steps to Reproduce:
1. wget

rpmquery -p --qf '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' thunderbird*

yum is happy that thunderbird- is newer than
thunderbird- but I have tools that think that
Epoch 0 is newer than Epoch (none).

Additional info:

Comment 2 Christopher Aillon 2007-03-04 20:35:23 UTC
This isn't a bug in thunderbird, really.  Epoch 0 is the same as no epoch.  It
only matters because rpm python bindings are broken and produces the wrong
result for the version comparison.  See the dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227860 ***