|Summary:||Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal <sindrepb>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Peter Gordon <peter>|
|Status:||CLOSED UPSTREAM||QA Contact:||Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-03-03 01:57:01 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-01-22 04:09:58 UTC
Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious-0.10.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Epilicious is an extension for the Epiphany web browser that lets you synchronise Epiphany and Delicious bookmarks. Package builds in mock. rpmlint output: E: epiphany-extensions-epilicious only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This package places files, including files that really should be in /usr/share, into the epiphany extention dir, which is in /usr/lib/epiphany/extensions/. The epiphany-extensions package itself does put data files in /usr/share, but I haven't been able to make this extension work doing that. Ignoring this rpmlint message is therefor the only solution I've been able to find. Suggestions are very welcome.
Comment 1 Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-01-22 04:11:38 UTC
Upstream tarball is not including a copy of the GPL, don't know if this is a blocker or not. I have contacted upstream trying to change this. README refers to an online copy of the GPL.
Comment 2 Peter Gordon 2007-03-03 01:57:01 UTC
Hi, Sindre. The epiplicious extension is included as part of the upstream epiphany-extensions package version 2.17.92 (which I will push to the build system in a couple of hours after my mock-build testing succeeds). Therefore, I'm going to close this bug as UPSTREAM. Thanks for your efforts in getting this packaged though! :)