Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 163458

Summary: A lots of typo/roff mistakes in the man page
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: SEKINE Tatsuo <sekine.t>
Component: logrotateAssignee: Peter Vrabec <pvrabec>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-01 12:52:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Description Flags
patch for the man page
new man page none

Description SEKINE Tatsuo 2005-07-17 12:02:03 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 Fedora/1.0.4-4 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
Please check the patch which I'll put later. Following description is for the patch.

- ".UC" is the macro for the UCB distribution. I think that logrotate was not born in UCB.

- In the configuration file, it is possible to specify multipul files.

- Normally tab stop length is 8 characters, so "+8n" is much better.

- ".pp" is not mandoc(man/mdoc) macro, so I guessed that ".PP" is appropriate.

The others are simple typo/copy&paste mistake.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Additional info:

Comment 1 SEKINE Tatsuo 2005-07-17 12:03:15 UTC
Created attachment 116850 [details]
patch for the man page

patch for the man page.

Comment 2 Peter Vrabec 2005-07-19 11:51:43 UTC
Created attachment 116925 [details]
new man page

Are you satisfied with this man page?

Comment 3 SEKINE Tatsuo 2005-07-19 12:48:59 UTC
In this case, I work for JM project, which is the translation project for Japanese.

That project is not Fedora specific, so I cecked out original man page from Therefore this (and #163366) report is not
for FC distribution. Because I could not choose appropriate one.

This new man page is including the description of some extra functionalities
which are provided by FC patch. This new one is fine for FC users, but it is not
correct for the original logrotate users.

My suggestion is that "Do as much of the development work as possible directly
in the *upstream* packages.", which is part of Fedora Project's Objectives. If
the all of patches are merged into original repository, more people will be made