Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 162722

Summary: static mutex initializers are not correct
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kelly Long <kelly_long>
Component: glibcAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: drepper, njh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.3.90-3 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-07-22 12:42:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 164814    
Attachments:
Description Flags
code and error related to fedora core 4 glibc static initalization of mutexes none

Comment 1 Kelly Long 2005-07-08 00:51:25 UTC
Created attachment 116498 [details]
code and error related to fedora core 4 glibc static initalization of mutexes

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2005-07-11 17:02:56 UTC
They are correct, some extra warnings just warn even about correct code.
Anyway, http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-07/msg00006.html
should shut these warnings up.

Comment 5 Jakub Jelinek 2005-07-22 12:42:55 UTC
Should be fixed in glibc-2.3.90-3.

Comment 7 Nigel Horne 2005-08-24 10:29:06 UTC
When will glibc-2.3.90-3 come out?

The latest, 2.3.5-10.3 as of 24/8/05, exhibits the same problem.

Comment 8 Jakub Jelinek 2005-08-24 13:35:07 UTC
glibc-2.3.90-3 came out more than a month ago, but glibc-2.3.90-* is a rawhide
version (i.e. FC5 development ATM; that's why it has been closed with RAWHIDE).
But glibc-2.3.5-10.3 also includes that fix and certainly doesn't exhibit
the problem for me.
When I fix the testcase a little (s/fprint(/fprintf (stderr, /, plus add return
0; at the end of main), I get:
rpm -qf /usr/include/pthread.h; gcc -W -Wall -O2 fc4-gcc4-mutex.c
x86_64/glibc-headers-2.3.5-10.3.x86_64.rpm
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c: In function 'main':
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c:8: warning: unused parameter 'argc'
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c:8: warning: unused parameter 'argv'
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c: At top level:
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c:4: warning: 'some_static_mutex' defined but not used
fc4-gcc4-mutex.c:6: warning: 'some_static_condition' defined but not used