Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 159100

Summary: system-config-securitylevel exits with errors
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Scott Talbot <talbotscott>
Component: system-config-securitylevelAssignee: Chris Lumens <clumens>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: ch.nolte
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.5.9-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-13 05:37:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 158504    

Description Scott Talbot 2005-05-29 17:24:30 UTC
Description of problem:
running app fails

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-securitylevel-1.5.8-1

How reproducible:
allways

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/system-config-securitylevel.py",
line 18, in ?
    app.stand_alone()
  File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/securitylevel.py", line 453, in
stand_alone
    self.readFile()
  File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/securitylevel.py", line 353, in
readFile
    protoname = socket.getservbyport(int(service), protocol)
socket.error: port/proto not found

Expected results:
GUI providing accesss to feature

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2005-06-09 15:07:15 UTC
I've committed a fix for this to Rawhide.  I'll build an FC4 update just as soon
as FC4 is released.

Comment 2 Scott Talbot 2005-06-13 05:37:50 UTC
You rock!  works as expected, and then some!  - Thanks

Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2005-06-15 14:32:38 UTC
*** Bug 160465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***