|Summary:||cone - FC4 x86_64 rebuild failed|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora>|
|Component:||cone||Assignee:||Steven Pritchard <steve>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||0.64-5||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2005-06-02 23:03:59 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-05-22 12:32:33 UTC
This package failed to rebuild on x86_64 for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after an automated release bump. No build logs available afaics. Please request a rebuild.
Comment 1 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-27 02:23:00 UTC
I just noticed on fedora-extras-commits that Jeremy Katz beat me to it. I've been trying to find some time to get my x86_64 test box updated to rawhide to try a test build here, but I suppose now I may not have to.
Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-28 00:19:25 UTC
So the build failed (again), but this time we have a build log. http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/development/cone/0.64-3/x86_64/cone-0.64-3.failure.log Scanning quickly through the build log, the failures seem to be from missing files. Compiling maildirkeywords4.cpp In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include /c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_tree.h:66, from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include /c++/4.0.0/set:65, from maildirkeywords.h:435, from maildirkeywords4.cpp:9: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_al gobase.h:64:28: error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory For a moment I thought perhaps cone.spec was missing an explicit BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel, but it is there, so I'm confused... I have my FC4t3/x86_64 test box up now, so I'll try a build there as soon as I get it updated to rawhide.
Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-05-28 01:32:02 UTC
No, this is a known x86_64 build system problem. libstdc++-devel 32-bit and 64-bit replacing eachother. It has been discussed before, on extras-list most likely (I think related to "octave" build failure).
Comment 4 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-28 15:20:08 UTC
Ah, right, I remember that now. So is there a better workaround than to just keep re-submitting the build request until it succeeds?
Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2005-06-02 18:31:47 UTC
I believe the trick is to not specify the redundant Buildrequires libstdc++-devel gcc-c++. With that, the build attempt did succeed: http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/needsign/4/cone/0.64-5/