Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 155845

Summary: The updated Serbian language locale sr_CS missing from glibc
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Filip Miletic <filmil>
Component: glibcAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-25 08:03:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Filip Miletic 2005-04-24 16:24:17 UTC
Description of problem:
The sr_CS UTF-8 locale, superceeding the old sr_YU locales is absent from glibc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc 2.3.5-0.fc3.1

How reproducible:
The locale is missing

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type 'date +%c' at the command prompt
  
Actual results:
gives out an english language date message.

Expected results:
should give out a serbian language cyrillic message, encoded as utf-8.

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/localedata/locales/sr_CS?cvsroot=glibc
is the link to glibc CVS where the new locale has been committed.

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2005-04-25 08:03:56 UTC
That locale is in rawhide and will appear in Fedora Core 4.
If you want, you can always compile that yourself on FC3, but it is not something
I'd release a new FC3 glibc update for.

Comment 2 Filip Miletic 2005-04-25 15:55:07 UTC
Is it not at least possible to merge it with any other possible updates to the
current FC3 glibc? Agreed, it is of limited importance and does not justify an
update; however, adding it to any other updates (if pending) is more than enough...