|Summary:||DocBook documentation is not compiled|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4||Reporter:||Matthew Booth <mbooth>|
|Component:||kernel||Assignee:||Red Hat Kernel Manager <kernel-mgr>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Brian Brock <bbrock>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2012-06-20 13:33:39 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Matthew Booth 2005-04-18 19:41:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050322 Firefox/1.0.2 Red Hat/1.0.2-1.4.1 Description of problem: The sgml files in /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.9/Documentation/DocBook are not compiled. They should be. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-doc-2.6.9-5.0.3.EL How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install kernel-doc-2.6.9-5.0.3.EL 2. Try to read /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.9/Documentation/DocBook/procfs-guide.tmpl Actual Results: Angst Expected Results: Browser based visual pleasure Additional info:
Comment 1 Dave Jones 2005-04-21 23:07:50 UTC
this sounds like a simple request, but its opening the gates to all sorts of issues. You can guarantee that soon after doing this, we'd get requests for us to build the pdf version, and the .ps version too. The build dependancies for all this would also be hurrendous, and add considerable time to the buildtime for each kernel. Leaving them in the sgml format where they can be generated to whatever form the user wants is probably for the best. However right now, its not possible to generate them from the standalone kernel-doc tree. I've no idea how much work is involved in making that stuff build standalone, but this is probably going to be pretty low priority, and unless there's a considerable demand for it, it probably won't get done any time soon. reassigning to pm as its essentially a feature request.
Comment 2 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 13:33:39 UTC
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.