|Summary:||suggest gpgcheck=1 in sample yum.conf|
|Product:||[Retired] Fedora Legacy||Reporter:||rob <rob.myers>|
|Component:||General||Assignee:||Fedora Legacy Bugs <bugs>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2005-04-27 18:26:55 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description David Lawrence 2005-03-30 23:27:57 UTC
<_blah_> i think on http://www.fedoralegacy.org/download/ where it tells you what to put in your yum.conf, it should include gpgcheck=1 <TheDom> _blah_: report a bug, otherwise it'll get forgotten about. I don't think Eric is around much at the moment. <_blah_> file in bugzilla? <_blah_> is there a website component, or keyword? <TheDom> just "General" ------- Additional Comments From firstname.lastname@example.org 2004-10-13 11:07:56 ---- This will only work for the FL version of yum, AFAIK. And we haven't released all the FL yum versions yet. Unless someone proves me wrong, I'd say this should wait until FL publishes a yum for all RHL versions (for the RHL yum.conf) and/or FC1 (for the Fedora Core yum.conf). Anyone disagree? ------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2004-10-13 14:28:10 ---- Perhaps relevant: gpgcheck=1 didn't work for me: I tried to use yum to upgrade from FC1 to FC2. (I was unable to escape depencency hell and didn't like the fact that some stuff was unsigned; should have followed the advice to use anaconda.) Several of the packages yum tried to install didn't have signatures. Sorry, I lost the logs when I reinstalled from scratch, so I can't offer specifics. I was using the redhat.com master site and/or the stanford.edu mirror. ------- Additional Comments From firstname.lastname@example.org 2004-11-09 08:24:39 ---- re: comment #1 if it works for fc1, then i vote for just updating that yum.conf entry. it might also be nice to tell people how to import the gpg key. re: comment #2 all fedora packages published by redhat should be gpg signed. if you found packages that were not gpg signed then you have bigger issues. ------- Bug moved to this database by email@example.com 2005-03-30 18:27 ------- This bug previously known as bug 2140 at https://bugzilla.fedora.us/ https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2140 Originally filed under the Fedora Legacy product and General component. Unknown priority P2. Setting to default priority "normal". Unknown platform PC. Setting to default platform "All". Setting qa contact to the default for this product. This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Comment 1 rob 2005-04-27 14:54:31 UTC
how about adding gpgcheck=1 to these documents? http://www.fedoralegacy.org/docs/yum-fc1.php http://www.fedoralegacy.org/docs/yum-fc2.php
Comment 2 Eric Jon Rostetter 2005-04-27 18:42:08 UTC
Done (added to yum-fc1.php and yum-fc2.php, not to /download/ as originally asked in this bug). Review, and if acceptible, then close the bug ticket.