Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 1515255

Summary: Containers row is not clickable in relationships table in provider page
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Gilad Shefer <gshefer>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Nimrod Shneor <nshneor>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.9.0CC: dajohnso, gblomqui, jfrey, jhardy, lavenel, obarenbo, pakotvan, snaim
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: Regression, TestOnly
Target Release: 5.10.0Flags: dajohnso: needinfo? (gshefer)
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1518862 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-21 20:46:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Container Management Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1518862    

Description Gilad Shefer 2017-11-20 12:54:45 UTC
Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Compute --> Containers --> Providers --> <my provider>
2. Click on summary view
3. Watch Relationships table

Actual results:
Containers is not clickable (even when there are more than 0 containers)

Expected results:
Containers is clickable

Additional info:

Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2017-11-20 13:02:44 UTC
Please assess the impact of this issue and update the severity accordingly.  Please refer to for a reminder on each severity's definition.

If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set the severity to Low.

Comment 3 Dave Johnson 2017-11-20 15:06:56 UTC
Is this a regression Gilad?

Comment 4 Nimrod Shneor 2017-11-29 12:15:55 UTC

Comment 6 Barak 2017-12-03 11:22:24 UTC
*** Bug 1518252 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***