Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 147780

Summary: Some IMAP folders not accessible
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David Woodhouse <dwmw2>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-13 22:24:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150221    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to make the namespace abuse optional none

Description David Woodhouse 2005-02-11 08:45:53 UTC
Evolution pollutes the IMAP server's namespace with its own 'Junk' and 'Trash'
folders, and prevents access to _real_ folders with those names. These are not
IMAP folders, and shouldn't be displayed in the IMAP heirarchy. They should
probably be shown in the vFolders tree instead, or somewhere entirely separate
from the IMAP namespace.

It's not acceptable to prevent access to _real_ folders on the IMAP server.

Ideally, it would be possible for the user to completely remove these.
Personally I can handle it, but for my father I have to rebuild Evolution
without 'Junk' support in order to prevent it from confusing him.

Comment 1 David Woodhouse 2005-04-21 23:29:05 UTC
Created attachment 113496 [details]
patch to make the namespace abuse optional

Comment 2 David Woodhouse 2005-08-06 10:15:30 UTC
I'm still having to build my own evo-data-server rpms to fix this bug. 

Comment 3 Dave Malcolm 2006-01-13 22:24:07 UTC
I've filed this upstream here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326909

I'm going to resolve this as UPSTREAM; I want to minimize the Fedora package's
delta from upstream here.