Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 1032686

Summary: PRD35 - [RFE] Save "domain related" OVFs on any data domain
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Component: RFEsAssignee: Liron Aravot <laravot>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Elad <ebenahar>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecifiedCC: acanan, bazulay, gklein, iheim, juwu, lpeer, mgoldboi, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sbonazzo, scohen, tnisan, yeylon
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 3.5.0Flags: scohen: Triaged+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/OvfOnWantedDomains
Whiteboard: storage
Fixed In Version: ovirt-engine-3.5.0_alpha1.1 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Previously, all virtual machine OVFs were stored on the master domain and are being updated asynchronously by the OvfAutoUpdater. With this feature, OVFs are now stored on all wanted domains to provide better recovery ability, and to reduce the use of master_fs and the master domain.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1054241 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-11 17:56:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1054241    
Bug Blocks: 1043440, 1043441, 1058522, 1080372, 1142923, 1156165, 1185830    

Description Allon Mureinik 2013-11-20 15:10:57 UTC
Description of problem:
As part of the attempt to eliminate the master domain, it is required to be able to back up OVFs on any arbitrary location, not just the masterfs.

Comment 1 Liron Aravot 2014-03-24 08:37:45 UTC
*** Bug 917648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Aharon Canan 2014-09-10 04:53:11 UTC
following https://tcms.engineering.redhat.com/run/163710/

verified.

Comment 3 Tal Nisan 2014-11-26 11:41:12 UTC
Julie, this bug has a feature page in the URL, is doc text really needed here?

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-02-11 17:56:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0158.html